Free CTAL-TTA_Syll2019_UK Mock Exam – Practice Online Confidently

Which option describes a good practice when applying test automation for a Regression-averse test approach? SELECT ONE OPTION

At which test level would performance efficiency testing most likely be performed?

The following user story has been written for a new application being developed to pre-book a space at a National Car Park. As a vehicle driver i want to be able to pre-book a car parking space online, selecting a disabled driver's space if needed So that l can pay in advance and receive confirmation of my parking space number. The following acceptance criteria have also been written: •Payment can be made via PayPal, Debit or Credit Card •Confirmation of payment and car parking details should be sent after the booking process is completed •Driver information is stored in the reservation database The database has been built and tested in a previous sprint, but the interface to the different payment methods have yet to be developed As a tester in an agile team, you have been asked to review the user story You have detected some issues with this story: 1.it needs to cater for different user groups: a driver or disabled driver 2.it needs to cater for different vehicle types: a car. 4x4. van or motorbike 3.There are no acceptance criteria relating to how quick the booking process should be 4.How confirmation is to be sent for payment and space number, and other important details, have not been specified 5.A stub will be needed to test the payment method Which pair of requirements engineering techniques are you MOST LIKELY to have used to uncover these issues’ SELECT ONE OPTION

Below is pseudo-code which calculates a customer's cruise credits based on past cruise history: PROGRAM CALC CRUISE CREDITS (CUST_ID) COUNT_CRUISES, CRUISE_CREDITS, LOYALTY_RATING: INTEGER CRUISE_LENGTH, CRUISE_ACCOM_TYPE: VAR LOYALTY_RATING = 0 COUNT_CRUISES = 0 CRUISE_LENGTH = 0 CRUISE_ACCOM_TYPE = 0 BEGIN READ CUSTOMER'S CRUISE HISTORY TO OBTAIN COUNT OF CRUISES READ CRUISE_HISTORY (CUST_ID) WHILE COUNT_CRUISES != -1 DO READ CUSTOMER'S NEXT CRUISE READ NEXT_CRUISE IF CRUISE_ACCOM_TYPE = 3 THEN CRUISE_CREDITS = CRUISE_CREDITS + 5 ELSE IF CRUISE_ACCOM_TYPE = 2 THEN CRUISE_CREDITS = CRUISE_CREDITS + 3 ELSE CRUISE_CREDITS = CRUISE_CREDITS + 2 ENDIF ENDIF COUNT_CRUISES = COUNT_CRUISES - 1 ENDWHILE LOYALTY_RATING = CRUISE_CREDITS / COUNT_CRUISES WRITE ("CRUISE CREDIT TOTAL IS:") WRITE (CRUISE_CREDITS) END PROGRAM CALC CRUISE CREDITS The code contains data flow anomalies on lines 14 and 27. Which examples of data flow anomalies can be found on these lines?

When performing code reviews, which of the following defect types will be most difficult to find?