Increase your chances of passing the GAQM ISO-QMS-13485 exam questions on your first try. Practice with our free online ISO-QMS-13485 exam mock test designed to help you prepare effectively and confidently.
A medical device company is undergoing an ISO 13485:2016 audit. During a tour of the manufacturing facility, the Lead Auditor observes that several production machines are connected to the company's internal network. The company has a firewall and intrusion detection system in place. However, there is no documented assessment of the cybersecurity risks associated with these network-connected machines, including the potential impact on product quality or patient safety if a machine were compromised. What is the MOST appropriate action for the Lead Auditor to take?
A medical device manufacturer is using a cloud-based software platform for managing its quality management system (QMS) documentation, including procedures, work instructions, and records. The manufacturer claims that since the cloud provider is ISO 27001 certified, they do not need to perform their own validation of the software's suitability for managing their QMS data. As a Lead Auditor, how should you respond?
A medical device company is undergoing an ISO 13485:2016 audit. The company utilizes a contract manufacturer for a critical component of their Class II medical device. The Lead Auditor reviews the company's process for controlling the outsourced process. The quality agreement with the contract manufacturer clearly defines the product specifications, quality requirements, and acceptance criteria. There is evidence of recent performance data trending showing sustained compliance, however, the quality agreement does not define how frequently the quality agreement itself is reviewed or updated. As a Lead Auditor, what is the MOST appropriate determination regarding the company's approach?
A medical device company uses a contract manufacturer to produce a critical component for one of their Class III devices. During an ISO 13485:2016 audit of the medical device company (not the contract manufacturer), the Lead Auditor reviews the records pertaining to the oversight of the contract manufacturer. The records show regular communication, agreed-upon specifications, and documented inspections of incoming components. However, there is no documented evidence of periodic on-site audits of the contract manufacturer's facilities. What is the MOST appropriate conclusion for the Lead Auditor to draw?
A medical device company manufactures Class IIa devices and is undergoing an ISO 13485:2016 audit. During a review of the organization's change control process, the Lead Auditor discovers that the company's impact assessment for product changes only focuses on assessing the impact to the design and manufacturing processes. There is no documented procedure for assessing the impact of the change on device labeling, including IFU (Instructions for Use), warnings and precautions, symbols, or any regulatory labeling requirements. As the Lead Auditor, what is the MOST appropriate action to take?
© Copyrights FreeMockExams 2026. All Rights Reserved
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website (FreeMockExams). If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the FreeMockExams.